Haga

Data room

External investor sharing

GTM

Pricing hypotheses

Draft

Pricing posture only — no external quotes until design-partner validation.

Rule: do not quote dollar amounts externally until validated with design partners. This page is internal posture for diligence readers.


Motions

Motion Price posture Notes
Pilot evaluation Fixed-scope project fee One policy or one world-model batch; defined episode budget
Repeat / multi-policy batch Discounted package Same harness, multiple artifacts or versions
Continuous scoring (Phase 5) Subscription Release-pipeline integration; re-baseline fees if thresholds change

Anchors (adjacent, not comps)

Signal What it suggests
Sim2Real public pilots $499–$2,500/mo Willingness to pay for sim-to-real tooling exists — different product (training loop, not independent audit)
Patronus / enterprise eval vendors Verification layers can support enterprise ACV once trust is established — not a near-term Haga price point
Academic benchmarks (free) Institutional trust can be free; Haga sells speed + private engagement, not free leaderboard slots

Use anchors for conversation, not for published rate cards.

Working ASP points used in TAM / SAM / SOM ($12k pilot / $18k near-term blended / $36k mature ACV) are internal hypotheses — update market sizing when design partners lock WTP.


Packaging principles

  1. Price the report and turnaround, not GPU hours alone
  2. Always include shown failures and sim-only limitations in scope — no “PASS-only” SKUs
  3. Keep pilot scopes narrow enough to deliver in days/weeks, not quarters
  4. Defer continuous-scoring pricing until at least one design partner has paid for a pilot and asked for repeat runs

Validation path

  1. Priority A outreach + inbound submit-for-eval (no public rate card)
  2. Record every conversation / WTP / objection on the design-partner pipeline
  3. Survival lane only: productized public-artifact audit (internal default quote) — dollars quoted only after payment gate; stop after 10 asks with no reply
  4. Only then publish ranges for investor materials

Related: Evaluation offering · ICP.